They did things differently in the 70’s. So much so that no one batted an eye-lid when a professor from Columbia University wrenched an infant chimpanzee from his mother, to give to his former lover to raise as a human child in New York City, as a language experiment. Meet Nim.
Nim Chimpsky was considered nothing more than a lab rat to Prof Herbert Terrace. A narcissus ‘villain’ who was intent on disproving the theory of Noam Chomsky (hence his name). Terrace was a behavioural psychologist and he was adamant, regardless of the cost to Nim’s well-being, to show that language is learnt and is not unique to humans. He wanted Nim to learn sign-language so that he would be able to communicate with him. But it wasn’t as straight forward as he had hoped and his project eventually failed.
Apes have the intelligence to learn to sign words, but they have not yet shown the ability to form complex sentences to prove they understand semantics in the same way a human child does. Their cognition is comparative to a three-year old child, but that’s where is ends.
The film, directed by James Marsh was absolutely fantastic, but very sad, which I was not actually prepared for. Terrace who is more randy than a dog on Viagra, picks out his researchers based on their body/mass index – clearly more interested in getting into their knickers than their ability to care for Nim appropriately. Nim’s life is unlike any other chimp, he’s breast-fed, smokes dope, drinks beer, is potty trained, tries humping a family cat and then one day without warning he’s tranquillised and wakes up in a cage in an animal facility to live with his own kind. No prizes for guessing his reaction when he sees another chimp for the first time.
Nim, like most foster kids becomes a product of a broken home. He is rehoused again and again with different carers until he’s cruelly abandoned. Does anyone blame him for developing behavioural issues, raised as a human and left to die as an animal, I’d be confused, wouldn’t you? He only lived to 26, chimps in captivity can live up to the age of 50. Towards the end of his life, Bob Ingersoll, one of the last researchers to show love and affection towards Nim, tracks him down and does his best to make his life a better one in his latter days.
Marsh cleverly uses the personal stories of the carers and Terrace and interweaves them with original footage from the 70’s-80’s along with some wonderful stills. Hindsight is a beautiful thing and more than 30 years on, many of those involved in the project regret the way Nim was treated; but Terrace shows very little remorse. His arrogance sadly prevails.
Nim’s life, a bittersweet one, is brilliantly depicted in this a remarkable documentary. I just hope it’s enough to shock people into realising that Nim and other primates like him, need to be treated with more respect than they are often given.

Nim as an infant, living in a New York apartment
Mapstone
August 26, 2011
Great review of a great documentary. Funny about the humans – sad about Nim.
It is wonderfully made but my only, slight, complaint is that the fundamental mystery at the heart of the story – the tantalising possibility of communication between species – remains unenlightened. Terrace ends up saying it’s all nonsense; and yet, there are sequences in the film where you do appear to be watching casual linguistic communication between Nim and his handlers. Which, to me, was amazing.
urbanprimate
August 27, 2011
Linguistic communication is fascinating and I think if apes could communicate using complex sentences I would hope they would tell us what a cruel race we are rather than “pass the banana please!”.
Sue Savage-Rumbaugh has worked with captive bonobos for 35 years. If you want to learn more, look at the plethora of work she has carried out with them. She works at The Great Ape Trust. Her work is pioneering and hopes to educate others in science about how intelligent these apes are and why they should not be medically tested on.
http://www.greatapetrust.org/science/scientists-biographies/sue-savage-rumbaugh.
A
Tim Brunt
August 26, 2011
It does look like very compelling viewing, and probably clears up a lot of the misunderstanding on the adptiveness of chimpanzees caused by films like ‘Project X’
urbanprimate
August 27, 2011
My God, Project X – now that’s a blast from the past!
There are so many films pre 1990’s where apes are portrayed as suitable “family pets” or “friends”. Even Tarzan perpetuated this idea by ensuring that Cheeta never grew up. He remained an infant, probably because he would have beaten the crap out of the Lord of the Jungle once he’d hit adulthood.
A
janis j
August 27, 2011
It is a horrofic tale the life of Nim. To place these intelliegent creatures in an atmosphere
that there instinct and behaviors cannot tolerate is abusive. It rips my heart into shreds to
see them in labs, entertainment or even pets. It is an awful existence for these beautiful
creatures that seem to have to be penalized for their natural instincts. Another story that
is so relevant to Nim’s is that lady that medicated her chimp on her own, without a vet seeing
him. Which resulted in the chimp reacting to the meds, ripping off her friend’s face. The result
they shoot and kill the chimp. To me, they should of shot the woman who medicated him. This
chimp was also treated like a family member. As he grew, his instincts became uncontrollable
for a household pet. Can our society open their eyes and see the cruelty we place on these creatures. Where has our humanity gone. They treat these creatures as poorly as the Nazi’s
did with Jews, as cruel as slavery….have we not learned anything. There dna is so close to
ours and they suffer for this fact.
urbanprimate
August 27, 2011
Humans I fear will never learn Janis.
The ego in man makes us the most dangerous species in the animal kingdom. There are those who think they have a right to dictate the terms and conditions of another species existence. Although there is some positive awareness making it into the mainstream it is not nearly enough to help protect these creatures. Until legislation is enforced, these animals, and others will continue to remain vulnerable.
A
Christian Daly
August 27, 2011
Hi Asha !
Interesting review ! I’ve never seen the film but if the opportunity arises I’ll try to. In my opinion, Christianity is to blame for much of the ill-treatment of other species. According to the bible, Man was created in the image of a God, who then handed the dominion of the other species over to Man. In reality, it seems we are just one species among a multitude sharing the same planet. It is certainly difficult to reconcile the apparent imperfections of humanity with the notion of an all-wise God !
best
Christian
urbanprimate
August 28, 2011
Perhaps, but surely we’ve “progressed” enough not to still use that excuse? But then again maybe we haven’t learnt anything at all.
A
Christian Daly
August 29, 2011
Unfortunately, a significant portion of the US Congress relies on funding from the Christian Fundamentalist movement( no relationship, I can assure you ! ) to get elected, so it seems inevitable that undue influence will be exercised on the whole legislative process, behind the scenes !
best
Christian
urbanprimate
August 29, 2011
Good point. There’s always an ulterior motive, isn’t there!
A