
Kitty was used as a breeder in Alamogordo (formerly the Coulston Foundation), in 1997 she was sent to a sanctuary.
The debate about chimpanzees being used for medical research reached boiling point this week, as campaigners in the United States filed a legal petition.
The row is over the fate of 14 chimpanzees who were allegedly moved illegally from a colony of 186 “research” chimpanzees that live in Alamogordo Primate Facility – AFP, (formerly the Coulston Foundation) in New Mexico to a controversial laboratory in Texas for use in experiments.
All of the apes and hundreds of other non human primates at Alamogordo are owned by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), a medical research organisation which is part of the United States Department of Health and Human Service.
Scientific research has not been carried out on non human primates at Alamogordo since the late 1990s, but when NIH announced it intended to transfer 14 chimps for research at Texas Biomedical Research Institute (formerly the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research), all hell broke loose.
The petition has been signed by 15 scientists who say the 14 chimpanzees should be returned immediately to their former home in New Mexico. Dallas physician and spokesman for the nonprofit organisation, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) John Pippin, whose members have signed the petition said: “Moving the chimpanzees was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of agency discretion, and in violation of the Federal Administrative Procedure Act.
“The 14 chimpanzees at Texas Biomed are perilously near the hot zone where bioterrorism agents are studied. Using hepatitis C-infected chimpanzees for biodefense work or other experiments will not be productive. Decades of experiments have shown that chimpanzees are poor models for human disease research, and these amazingly intelligent animals deserve a peaceful retirement.”
The four female and 10 male chimpanzees were transferred to the Texas Biomed, which supports the use of primates for studies involving bioterrorism agents and other deadly pathogens, including the Ebola virus and anthrax. A few months after the 14 were transferred, the 186 chimpanzees remaining at the non-research facility in New Mexico were granted a reprieve from transfer and further experimentation. This was after the NIH agreed to wait for the findings of the independent Institute of Medicine, which is carrying out an in-depth analysis to reassess the scientific need for the continued use of chimpanzees to accelerate biomedical discoveries.
Many of the 14 chimpanzees are elderly and have been used repeatedly for invasive procedures. Medical records reveal that 29-year-old Rosie was “chemically immobilised” 99 times by researchers. Thirty-year-old Cammy was intravenously given human feces containing hepatitis A virus. She was also given the human Norwalk virus, a gastrointestinal virus causing vomiting and diarrhoea in people, via stomach tube.
Last year US Congress began considering a bill – the Great Ape Protection Act – that would ban this type of biomedical research. It has the backing of politicians, primatologist Jane Goodall and the Humane Society. The US is the only developed nation that still carries out experiments on chimpanzees. The practice is banned here in the UK.
The Great Ape Protection Act is gathering support, celebrities including ‘Bones’ actress Emily Deschanel and Hollywood actor Wood Harrelson, who is working alongside People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have also added their voice to calls for the NIH to return the chimps. In January, Harrelson wrote: “Will you please return the 14 chimpanzees … to these simple pleasures and allow them to continue the rehabilitation that they have more than earned?”
Chimpanzees in captivity have an average life span of 30 years, but can live up to 50 years. In the past chimps were bred for research facilities, but now there is a ban on breeding at all US research facilities and it has meant the number of captive apes has fallen, and those available for experimental research could die out within several decades. Importing chimpanzees into the US is also illegal.
But some researchers insist the experiments are vital, and vigorously defend lab studies on animals such as mice and chimpanzees to advance medicine. Director of the Southwest National Primate Research Center, John VandeBerg, which requested the Alamogordo chimps, told the newspaper, Washington Post: “We’ve made a lot of progress in research on hepatitis using chimpanzees.”
He said the experiments led to the development of “many drugs for treating both hepatitis B and C.” VandeBerg acknowledged that the European Union, Japan, Australia and other developed nations no longer use chimpanzees for medical experiments.
“Scientists in Europe come here to do their research on chimpanzees. Their societies made a decision that was driven by animal rights advocates. But they need chimpanzees just as badly as we do. In order to avoid animal rights campaigns against them, their governments decided not to use chimpanzees.”
But other experts say chimpanzees are poor models for cancer and AIDS research, and their usefulness for hepatitis research is in dispute.
The chimps infected with hepatitis, have undergone two medical examinations where blood was drawn to gauge the levels of the virus, and two needle biopsies extracted tissue from their livers for examination.
VandeBerg added: “The animal rights people make it seem like it’s a horrible thing to do. It’s a very simple clinical procedure. It’s not painful.”
According to the newspaper it’s not quite so clear-cut. A veterinarian who reviewed Rosie’s medical record, Mel Richardson, obtained from NIH following a Freedom of Information Act (FoI) request, found as early as age 8, she suffered from seizures after being placed under anaesthesia. Rosie continued to suffer seizures under anesthesia for 11 years. Ms Richardson said hercurrent condition is “at-risk, due to her extreme morbid obesity.” and recommended she be returned to New Mexico .
The NIH Office of Extramural Research has issued this statement:
The transfer of the chimps from Alamogordo Primate Facility (APF) to Southwest had been in the planning stages since early 2009 and all APF chimps were staged as to when they would move. These 14 were moved as part of the first planned stage. Other APF chimps were to be moved after remodeling of the Southwest facility was further along.
Vivienne Palmer
March 31, 2011
Having worked as a volunteer with chimps in Cameroon and at a sanctuary in the US, it is clear to me that a chimp’s capacity for suffering is no less than that of a human being. Would we experiment in this way with a non-consenting human? If not, then we shouldn’t be doing it to apes either. The question of benefit to humans is a red herring – sometimes things are so ethically wrong that any possible benefits are outweighed by the cost involved in obtaining them.
urbanprimate
March 31, 2011
Hi Vivienne, I would have to agree with you. Knowing what we know now about primates, there are good grounds to stop testing. It does surprise me that the US is the only developed country to still do this.
Vivienne Palmer
March 31, 2011
I agree, although US animal welfare legislation is often less developed than in Europe (i.e. the prevalence of roadside zoos, and the conditions in industrial farms to name but two areas). Some US pharmaceutical companies are outsourcing their primate research to countries like China, which have very limited animal welfare legislation
http://www.outsourcing-pharma.com/Preclinical-Research/PETA-accuses-Pfizer-of-denying-animal-testing-pledge
The reason for doing this is often given as pressure by groups such as PETA, but I suspect that it has much more to do with reducing costs.
urbanprimate
March 31, 2011
Yes sadly this is common. Also you find a lot of European scientists going over to the States to do their ‘research’ because chimps are still used in labs.
Hope you’re enjoying the blog and thanks for subscribing.
A
Chico
April 1, 2011
I don’t understand why animal rights activists can ask the ban on vivisection just for chimps! since goodall tells around that these animals are like ‘us’ everybody cares just about them and forgets the other species! I am for a ban of all vivisection on all animals! Other things I don’t sign! This is unjust and a shot in the back of animal rights fighters! All animals are sentient beings and have feelings and a language – but the human species is too stupid to understand this, they just make a difference when it comes to chimps – this is pathetic and ridiculous!
urbanprimate
April 1, 2011
Hi Chico,
Thanks for your comments. I sympathise with how you feel, apes sadly maybe our only way of setting the “bar”. Given their large brains it may be the breakthrough needed to change sentiment.
Vivienne Palmer
April 2, 2011
Chico, surely it is better to make some progress on this issue than none? A petition calling for a ban on experimenting on chimpanzees has some small chance of success, given that such experimentation is already banned in Europe, and given people’s growing empathy with apes. This could be the ‘foot in the door’ to progress to banning experimentation on other primates, and eventually other animals, but even if it isn’t, less animals would be suffering.
For what it’s worth, I sympathise greatly with your point of view – I just feel that we need to take our wins where it’s possible to get them at the moment, rather than waiting for perfection.
V CHROBOT
April 3, 2011
let the chimps go
everyone knows this is not about
helping anyone!!!!!!!!!!!!
jay
July 3, 2011
Where do we sign ? Kets provide links here !
urbanprimate
July 4, 2011
Hello,
Not sure if the petition is still open, but you could log onto the Great Ape Surivial Project site and see if there’s a link still available.
Best
A
Jess
July 25, 2011
Thanks so much for your blog! Do you know of any sites that provide information for people interested in the conservation and humane treatment of primates?
-Jess
urbanprimate
July 26, 2011
Hi Jess,
Thanks for the comment. Apart from specific charities like WWF or JGI, there isn’t a website which includes a science perspective with conservation/primates presented as news. Hence why I started this blog. I am a British freelance national news journalist and I wanted to be able to write stories which just focuses on these points. I hope you’ll subscribe to the blog. In the meantime I hope you find what you’re looking for.
Best
A